PALUBA
March 23, 2019, 07:29:48 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Prilikom registracije lozinka mora da sadrži najmanje osam karaktera, od toga jedno veliko slovo, i bar jedan broj, u protivnom registracija neće biti uspešna
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Del.icio.us Digg FURL FaceBook Stumble Upon Reddit SlashDot

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Destroyer SPLIT  (Read 17355 times)
 
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
crolick
mornar
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21



WWW
« on: September 06, 2010, 09:08:10 pm »

Hi guys,

below I'm enclosing two of my artistic visions of the destroyer SPLIT (first design). Please keep in mind that it is based on German and Italian sources so it might not be true. Therefore any comments or additions are greatly appreciated! Was there ever published any drawing of prewar version of SPLIT in any Yugoslavian book or newspaper?


* 1.gif (8.13 KB. 1200x600 - viewed 444 times.)


* 2.gif (118.99 KB. 1200x600 - viewed 465 times.)

Andrzej

PS.
Here is topic in which I was discussing this drawing: http://www.phpbbplanet.com/warshipprojects/viewtopic.php?t=1027&mforum=warshipprojects

« Last Edit: September 07, 2010, 07:00:14 am by Boro Prodanic, Reason: Pictures into attachment » Logged
kumbor
kapetan bojnog broda
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 14 169


« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2010, 09:33:10 pm »

Welcome, Crolick

Very interesting! I myself thought of that how this ship might have looked if completed. One-stacked (1 kominovy) looks more like Grom/Blyskavica. If two-stacked, I think she would look more like destroyer of "Beograd" class, which is more probable.
Logged
crolick
mornar
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21



WWW
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2012, 09:15:26 pm »

Welcome, Crolick

Very interesting! I myself thought of that how this ship might have looked if completed. One-stacked (1 kominovy) looks more like Grom/Blyskavica. If two-stacked, I think she would look more like destroyer of "Beograd" class, which is more probable.
Yes I do agree that 2-stacked is more probable however Brescia in his article about SPLIT drew only one stack. This is why I've made two versions Smiley

Though I hope that one day original plans of SPLIT will be found (or already are - I've heard rumours that Freivogel found something about SPLIT) and then we will be able to compare the original drawing with my sketches Cool


All the best,
Andrzej
Logged
ViribusUnitis
vodnik
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 388


« Reply #3 on: December 31, 2012, 12:06:23 am »

Was the intended name of destroyer "Split", the same one that was decided after WW2?
Logged
crolick
mornar
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21



WWW
« Reply #4 on: December 31, 2012, 08:45:30 pm »

Was the intended name of destroyer "Split", the same one that was decided after WW2?
Pre-war SPLIT and post-war SPLIT is the same vessel. Just a bit rebuilt Wink
Logged
ViribusUnitis
vodnik
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 388


« Reply #5 on: January 01, 2013, 12:30:34 am »

I know it is the same vessel. I asked about the name, because I did not know that pre-war destroyer was aslo named "Split". (If it was named "Split", which I am not sure, so I am asking). For example, Maritime Encyclopedia (JLZ Edition Zagreb) on the fleet list of Yugoslav Royal Navy names that destroyer like "N".
Logged
kumbor
kapetan bojnog broda
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 14 169


« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2013, 11:44:19 am »

"N" stands presumably for "New". It is probable that, if she would have been built, she would have been named  "Split". Nevertheless, in the end of thirties, structure of the country was in question - it was going towards federalization, and it would have affected naming of, for Yugoslavia, "capital ships".
Logged
ViribusUnitis
vodnik
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 388


« Reply #7 on: January 01, 2013, 06:13:49 pm »

Well, besides of federalization vs. centralization dispute, ship naming policy reflected all parts of the country, for example, destroyers "B", "Z" and "LJ". With "Dubrovnik" and "Split", the third one (or the sixth) would probably be named "Sušak".
New Yugoslavia had similar naming policy. Names of republics for cruisers (never bulit), big Adriatic ports for destroyers etc.
Logged
jadran2
Stručni saradnik - Istorija RM
kapetan bojnog broda
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13 090



« Reply #8 on: January 01, 2013, 07:44:27 pm »

......The French company Chantiers de Loire helped with design work basing the ship on the Le Fantasque class destroyer.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_destroyer_Split
Logged
crolick
mornar
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 21



WWW
« Reply #9 on: October 08, 2016, 03:37:28 pm »

WoW Shocked
http://www.forum-marinearchiv.de/smf/index.php/topic,26704.msg305037.html#msg305037
Logged
MOTORISTA
Writer Palube
Global Moderator
kapetan bojnog broda
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 31 353



« Reply #10 on: October 08, 2016, 04:24:23 pm »

Well, all we can do is to wait for that article. Cheesy
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder

SMFAds for Free Forums
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.018 seconds with 24 queries.