PALUBA
March 29, 2024, 12:52:54 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Važno - Obavezno proverite i neželjenu (junk/spam) e-poštu da bi ste našli svoj aktivacioni link te aktivirali svoj nalog
 
   Home   Help Login Register  

Prijatelji

▼▼▼▼

Mesto za Vaš baner

kontakt: brok@paluba.info

Del.icio.us Digg FURL FaceBook Stumble Upon Reddit SlashDot

Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Royal Yugoslav navy Tankers  (Read 18387 times)
 
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Dili
desetar
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 107


« on: September 05, 2009, 01:44:52 pm »

Perun

1939
Builder: Soc. Anon. John Cockerill, Hoboken, Antwerp  for Royal Yugoslav Navy

Captured and in use by Italians renamed Devoli, sunk 17 March 1943 by HMS Splendid (Lt. I.L.M. McGeogh, RN) , 6 nautical miles bearing 245 of Cape San Vito, Sicily, Italy.

It is in deep water at 140m but seems some got there http://www.rebreatherworld.com/rebreather-wreck-diving/6505-devoli-tanker-in-south-italy-sicily.html
Unfortunately the link there doesn't work.

3,177 grt; 1,514 nett. 4500 ts, tp, 3177 BRT; 94,9×13,9×6,1 m; 2 SD., 1250 KM, 2 sr, 10 w; tr, / ; 4×40pl(probably Skoda 40/67), 2×12,7pl(maybe 15mm), 3000 tr; z. 100.

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

Pictures found in Bundesarchive, i think it is Perun http://www.bild.bundesarchiv.de/cross-search/search/_1252154028/

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]



* DEVOLI-Perum.jpg (11.49 KB, 492x137 - viewed 384 times.)

* athene-56alstl8mokcw0hv9ti_layout.jpg (26.81 KB, 500x337 - viewed 384 times.)

* athene-56alsuh84ug1ix6ge9ti_layout.jpg (15.64 KB, 500x336 - viewed 403 times.)
Logged
Dreadnought
Počasni global moderator
kapetan bojnog broda
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 69 456



« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2009, 06:48:40 pm »

You are right ... it is Perun

[ Attachment: You are not allowed to view attachments ]



* 2009-09-05_194755.jpg (36.62 KB, 546x423 - viewed 349 times.)
Logged
Dili
desetar
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 107


« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2009, 04:17:21 pm »

Thanks dreadnought.

One question, what was the rationale of a Tanker like this for the Navy. Supply between harbours? it seems too much able(read Oceanic) for that.
Logged
Dreadnought
Počasni global moderator
kapetan bojnog broda
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 69 456



« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2009, 04:27:38 pm »

I really don't have accurate data ... To assume is, that the oiler is supposed to supply submarines in to the open sea ... and other ships as well ...

Perhaps for the case to increase the autonomy of the fleet in case of war ...
Logged
Dili
desetar
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 107


« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2009, 05:36:50 pm »

I suppose you don't know if they made any supplying training in open seas, maybe photos of Perun with fleet ?
Logged
Perun
poručnik korvete
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3 668


« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2014, 06:37:19 pm »

lipe slike
Logged
kumbor
Stručni saradnik - opšti
kapetan bojnog broda
*
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 17 447


« Reply #6 on: February 04, 2014, 10:43:24 am »


Procedures and technical equipment for on the way refuelling were in their beginning at that time, but it was possible, although difficult.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Prijatelji

▼▼▼▼

Prostor za Vaš baner

kontakt: brok@paluba.info

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Simple Audio Video Embedder

SMFAds for Free Forums
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.024 seconds with 23 queries.